Beijing's first Bitcoin "commitment" deal decision: deal shows nothing

最多浏览

观点 | PoW 有效率

额外的能量消耗提高了我们的生活水平。

MetaMask小狐狸钱包使用教程

这篇文章主要介绍了MetaMask小狐狸钱包使用教程,小狐狸钱包是目前比较流行的以太坊钱包,其备受欢迎的主要原因是小狐狸钱包支持以太坊的主网、测试网,以及火币生态链和币安智能链,目前很多新手投资者还不会用小狐狸钱包,针对此类问题,下面给大家详细说说使用教程。

区块链IDO是什么意思?IDO与IPOICO的区别...

这篇文章主要介绍了区块链IDO是什么意思?IDO与IPO\ICO的区别,IDO是以“资产通证”为交易核心的一种数字资产交易模式。IDO(首次资产通证要约回购式发行)最大的意义在于发行数字资产的发行方以要约回购的方式保证首次发行的投资本金安全。下面一起来了解一下吧!

On December 15, the Beijing Chaoyang Court held a public hearing on a dispute resolution service agreement due to the delay in Bitcoin mining and ruled. The trial court ruled that the contract was invalid and decided to drop the plaintiff’s claim for payment of a huge Bitcoin. The case is said to be the first case in which a Beijing court has ruled that a Bitcoin mining contract is illegal. Following the ruling, the Chaoyang Court sent a decision to the Sichuan Province Development and Reform Commission to comment on the virtual “business” benefits involved in the case and recommend that the buildings be involved and qu ‘they are repaired.

Put your bitcoins to “mining”

M. A lawsuit for $ 9.55 million

In May 2019, Fengfu Jiuxin Company and Zhongyan Zhichuang Company signed “Computer Equipment Agreement” and “Services” and other agreements, and Fengfu Jiuxin Company to Zhongyan Zhichuang Company for micro servers storage space (for example, “mining technology”), provide value-added data services of “mining” of Bitcoin and pay for additional services The company Fengfu Jiuxin paid the cost management for the company Zhongyan Zhichuang.

After the deal, Fengfu Jiuxin Company paid Zhongyan Zhichuang Company 10 million yuan, and Zhongyan Zhichuang Company bought the “mining machine” and signed a contract with a third company. The “mining machine” operates in the “mines” of Shuiluo and Shawan townships, Mulli county, Liangshan county, Sichuan province.

Upon completion of the contract, Zhongyan Zhichuang Company paid 18.3463 BTC to Fengfu Jiuxin Company for value added tax and has not paid any additional fees since. Fengfu Jiuxin Co., Ltd. repeatedly stated that no benefit was sent to court, so Zhongyan Zhichuang Co., Ltd. sent 278,1654976 bitcoins and asked the court to recover the loss of the micro-storage server after the service. expired. . Fengfu Jiuxin said the value of the Bitcoin Zhongyan Zhichuang was due to send was $ 9.55 million, according to the market value of Bitcoin at the time of the trial.

The court ruled that the “only” act was in the public interest.

If the exchange has prohibited the disclosure of non-compliance with the contract by the competent authorities;

Journalists have learned that the so-called “mining” of Bitcoin is actually work for virtual profit from high-end computers. The developers of Bitcoin initially set a fixed price for Bitcoin virtual currency and wanted to use “mining machines” as quick calculations to solve crypto puzzles in order to obtain Bitcoin.

“Miners” refer to the specialized computers that perform these tasks, and “mines” are where thousands of computers needed to perform these specialized functions have been stored. Since Bitcoin mining uses a lot of energy, “miners” will look for sites that provide cheap electricity for “mining operations”.

The Chaoyang court ruled that this “mining” operation consumes a lot of energy and carbon emissions, which is not necessary for our country’s economic development, energy saving and emission reduction, and it is not necessary for our country to achieve CO2 objective. Many risks include high and low carbon neutrality, virtual currency, the risk of counterfeit assets, the risk of market failure and the investment risk received by connecting companies stand out, affecting the well-being of the community. community.

Fengfu Jiuxin Company and Zhongyan Zhichuang Company also signed “trade” agreements when they realized there were risks in the “trade” and Bitcoin market, and authorities were concerned about clearly limiting the Bitcoin market. This agreement is non-binding and affects the rights required by law. The interests of the company are not protected by law and the profits from the above activities must come from both parties themselves.

Ultimately, the court concluded that the agreement between the two parties was void and decided to dismiss any claims made by Fengfu Jiuxin Company.

The judge warned: production and marketing

This must be done in accordance with the law and regulations.

According to Li Zenghui, presiding judge in the case, in September this year, the National Development and Reform Commission and 10 other agencies jointly issued a “reform notice” in the “Mining” game of virtual currency and introduce the destruction of virtual currency. . . Growth has a negative impact on promoting sustainable growth and development, energy savings and emission reductions, and quality measures must be taken to ensure virtually all operations virtual mining.

Li Zenghui said that all production and marketing should be carried out in accordance with the authorization of national laws and regulations and trade rules. public interest. Additionally, Bitcoin does not have the same legal status as Korean fiat currency, virtual currency market activities have no real value, and price management is easy. Financing of the issuance of tokens and commercial risks. National regulators have also issued a series of warnings warning consumers that the risks and losses caused by investing and trading in virtual currency entries must be borne by participants. Citizens should always be aware of risk prevention and be aware of the risks of the cryptocurrency market.

After the court ruled that day, the Chaoyang court sent a letter of recommendation to the Sichuan Provincial Development and Reform Commission to investigate the Bitcoin mining project involved in the case and ban the company. to continue towards “the mining industry”. Exploration of “mines” and other “mining” projects in local virtual currency related to activities, events and maintenance.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

4 + 8 =

最新文章

比特币挖矿难度创新高!矿池无惧空头市场仍加强算力

比特币网络的挖矿难度已攀抵26.643T(Trillion)创下新高,平均算力达每秒190.71EH/s,这显示尽管比特币的空头市场走势继续存在,但社群的支持度依然强劲。

继中国后 多个国家拟“禁止比特币挖矿”

自2021年5月以来,我国启动虚拟货币“挖矿”整治活动。内蒙古、云南、新疆、青海、四川、安徽、河北、江苏、浙江、福建、海南等省份先后出手。

美国国会今日召开听证会,聚焦加密采矿能源使用

美东时间周四上午10:30,美国众议院能源和商务委员会召开听证会,讨论加密采矿对环境的影响。监督和调查小组委员会向五位证人询问有关工作量证明共识机制、加密网络的供电方式以及存在哪些工具或解决方案来减轻环境影响的问题。

北京法院:比特币“挖矿”属于风险投资活动

1月23日消息,近日,北京市东城法院经审理案件认为:比特币(Bitcoin)是一种通过特定计算机程序计算出来的虚拟货币,具有去中心化、总量有限、匿名性等特点。

俄罗斯央行提议全面禁止加密挖矿及交易

俄罗斯央行要求加强正在进行的加密货币支付禁令,并寻求引入惩罚措施。在周四发表的一份报告中,俄罗斯中央银行要求全面禁止国内加密货币交易和挖矿。